Skip to main content

The Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan came under fire last year when he did a sit down interview with Kennedy on his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, regarding Covid-19 and vaccines. The three hour long episode is full of misinformation and conspiracy theories about the impact Covid-19 has had on communities, as well as the Coronavirus vaccine. The San Antonio Current reports that Rogan said in 2023 that "A lot of times if you see me on this podcast talking about s***, I probably just read the headline". The controversy surrounding his podcast began in 2021, when he encouraged his audience to ignore the advice of medical professionals regarding the Omicron strand of the virus. He received backlash for having a number of guests who were set on spreading their anti-vaccine agenda, providing no evidence or research, US News reports. His main talking point in 2021 was that Covid-19 is just like the cold and anyone who gets it just needs a couple days of rest. This was disproved by a countless number of experts in the field, but Rogan never responded to it. This is just one example of his lack of accountability, which “requires that individuals, companies, and organizations explain themselves”(Caroll 273). 


Joe Rogan//Image from Flickr

     The Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly published data showing that the benefits of the coronavirus vaccines overwhelmingly outweigh the risks. But the internet firestorm highlights that vaccine misinformation is becoming increasingly mainstream with no signs of slowing down. While Joe Rogan’s podcast is right-leaning, his choices of guests highlight his bias and lack of objectivity on current issues. Caroll explains in chapter 9 that credibility depends on at least the perception of objectivity, or to “embrace and acknowledge our biases and, in disclosing them, present transparency as our claim to credibility and trustworthiness”(269). Rogan doesn't seem to practice either of these. If an entire episode is going to be dedicated to discussing the virus and vaccines, it’s not good practice to have on one guest with one (unresearched) view point. 

     His most recent controversy surrounds a conversation on his podcast with longtime vaccine misinformation spreader and current not-inconsequential Joe Biden primary challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr. According to Vox, Rogan invited vaccine scientist Peter Hotez to debate vaccines with Kennedy on his show. Hotez declined, instead offering Rogan a one-on-one conversation. Rogan insisted on a debate, and Elon Musk popped into his replies with a jab at Hotez, implying Hotez was afraid of the debate. Debates are less than ideal forums for communicating science. The Vox article also explains that  “if someone seems most motivated by a desire to create a public spectacle — if, perhaps, they refuse one-on-one conversation — or they don’t seem interested in learning something new about a subject, these may be indicators that an interaction with that person is going to be unproductive”.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dispelling Myths and Misinformation on Immigration

Conservative talking points frequently portray immigrants as a drain on public resources or as being disproportionately involved in criminal activity. These claims are often exaggerated or false, as research consistently shows that immigrants contribute positively to the economy and are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.       According to the ACLU , a central promise of Trump’s 2024 campaign is to “carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history” once in office. Trump is attacking birthright citizenship, barring undocumented children from schools, and again forcibly separating children from their parents at the border. The Trump team’s strategy is to dismantle our nation’s asylum protection system and attack human rights at the border.       Trump in October suggested that migrants who are in the U.S. and have committed murder did so because “it’s in their genes” AP News repo...

Donald Trump is a danger to the free press

     I was reading an article from the Guardian about Trump’s plan to take over Gaza . I get to the end of the article and there is a lengthy message from the Guardian. It reads: “With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting.” It continues, “The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful.” This frightened me, not just as a journalist, but as someone who relies on the news to be an accurate and unbiased source of information.       When Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2017, nine journalists were arrested while covering protests in Washington, DC, with several facing rioting charges. This marked the beginning of a troubling trend over the next ...

ENGL 339 Blog 3: Inside the Tutoring Session

     The purpose of “Nuts and Bolts of Mad Scientist’s Guide to Composition” is to brush up on the “nuts and bolts” of English prose. The first section covers dismembered parts of speech, specifically how nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs and coordinating conjunctions are used to form sentences. The next section explains that using they/them/their is not only acceptable but a more gender neutral/inclusive alternative when assigning pronouns in a sentence. The chapter also touches on incomplete clauses, danger words, fixing sentence fragments, and punctuation. Ch. 2: Inside the Tutoring Session provides an overview of the structure of a tutoring session and what typically happens during one. While the session’s flow depends on the student’s progress with their paper, there are some key elements that are consistent across every session. It usually starts with establishing rapport with the writer and asking questions about their paper that will help guide your approach. From...